Could this statement be any clearer? From ClickonDetroit:
“It’s easy, and a lot of people go there. Plus people are not allowed to carry guns in church. Plus it would make the news. Everybody would’ve heard. Honestly I regret not doing it. If I can’t do jihad in the Middle East, I would do my jihad over here.”
He had also told the undercover agent that a church would be an easy target because people are not allowed to carry guns there and that it would make the news. . . .
As a reminder of a few of the other similar cases see this list.
gun free zones, mass public shootings
Related posts
The War On Guns: Arming Yourself Against Gun Control Lies
More Guns, Less Crime (University of Chicago Press, 3rd ed, 2010)
Straight Shooting: Firearms, Economics and Public Policy
Stalked and Defenseless: How Gun Control Helped My Stalker Murder My Husband in Front of Me
Freedomnomics, see Chapter 4 for a general overview of the economics of crime
Dumbing Down the Courts: How Politics Keeps the Smartest Judges Off the Bench
[…] shooters consciously pick targets where they know victims won’t be able to defend themselves (here, here, […]
[…] largest churches in Detroit. An FBI wire recorded him explaining why he had targeted the church: “It’s easy, and a lot of people go there. Plus people are not allowed to carry guns in church. Plus…” Fortunately, that ISIS sympathizer was turned in by his father. But during the last couple of […]
[…] Yet more evidence that terrorists pick gun-free zones to attack […]