Donate

“Does race play a role in ‘stand your ground’ defenses?”

Aug 6, 2018 | Featured

media appearance television

St. Petersburg, FL’s Channel 9 interviews Dr. John Roman, Dr. John Lott, and Justin Murphy. As usual, the media identifies Lott as pro-gun and doesn’t have similar anti-self-defense labels for the other two people.

The surveillance video from the store shows that on July 19th Markeis McGlockton, 28 violently pushed 48-year-old Michael Drejka to the ground about 4 seconds before Drejka shoots McGlockton.

There were a couple of points that Dr. Lott made to the TV station about this case that weren’t included in the video or the accompanying article.

— It isn’t obvious why the Stand Your Ground part of the law is even relevant here as the older man is on the ground and really isn’t able to retreat any further.

— The use of force by the person being threatened has to be proportionate to the threat they face. If the person is unarmed, it is much harder to show that a gun is a proportionate use of force.

Lott’s research is available in Chapter 13 in The War on Guns. An older less complete version of it is available here from his testimony before Senate Judiciary Committee
A critique of Roman’s arguments is available here.

johnrlott

0 Comments

Categories

Archives

Major Decision: U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit Strikes Down New Jersey’s semi-automatic rifles and large-capacity magazines bans. With Commentary. Copy of decision is available here. NJ Governor Responds to Decision.

Major Decision: U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit Strikes Down New Jersey’s semi-automatic rifles and large-capacity magazines bans. With Commentary. Copy of decision is available here. NJ Governor Responds to Decision.

by | Jul 17, 2026 | ,

As expected, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, in an en banc decision, has struck down New Jersey's prohibitions on semi-automatic rifles and large-capacity magazines. It is a major decision because he creates a circuit court split for the first time. The...

While Americans strongly support deporting illegal aliens who have committed crimes, they are divided on “sanctuary” states that restrict state and local officials from cooperating with federal immigration authorities, though more believe “sanctuary” policies jeopardize public safety.

While Americans strongly support deporting illegal aliens who have committed crimes, they are divided on “sanctuary” states that restrict state and local officials from cooperating with federal immigration authorities, though more believe “sanctuary” policies jeopardize public safety.

by | Jul 17, 2026 | ,

Voters appear to hold someone inconsistent positions on deporting illegal aliens and sanctuary policies. While voters are equally divided on "sanctuary" states stopping state and local officials from cooperating with federal immigration authorities, by a ten...