California’s Proposition 63 on Background Checks for Ammunition has Dramatically Reduced the number of Ammunition Sales by 92%

May 25, 2020 | background checks

California’s background checks on ammunition went into effect on July 1, 2019, and they have had a dramatic impact on ammunition purchases by law-abiding citizens and thus presumably on citizens’ ability to use guns in self-defense.

the district court also noted the system’s apparent effect on the overall volume of ammunition transactions: although California had forecast that “approximately 13 million ammunition transactions” would occur in one year, the number of background checks conducted using the two primary methods was “only 635,856” over a seven-month period.

Kim Rhode et al v. Becerra (9th Cir.), May 14, 2020.

For those seven months, that is an actual annual rate of 1,090,039 ammunition transactions, a rate that is just 8.38% of what the state expected.

The impact on law-abiding citizens has been substantial.

The district court found that, through January 2020, there were some 754 instances in which a prohibited person was prevented from purchasing ammunition through California’s ammunition background check system, and approximately 101,047 instances in which “residents who are not prohibited persons … failed a background check.”

Kim Rhode et al v. Becerra (9th Cir.), May 14, 2020.

The state argues that this 101,047 overstates the problem because it includes cases the system stopped the same nonprohibited individuals from buying ammunition on multiple occasions. “Correcting” this reportedly reduces the number of unique individuals by 25% to 81,112. In addition, “many of these 81,000 or so persons were subsequently able to pass a different, more cumbersome form of background check and to purchase ammunition.” Between 53.5% and 60% purchasers who are rejected each month never end up purchasing ammunition — for a total of 45,000.

The fact that people have to go through the process multiple times before they are allowed to purchase ammunition or that they have to go through a “more cumbersome form of background check” all indicate a real burden imposed on people purchasing ammunition. That discussion doesn’t even count the fees required to pay for the background check.

The bottom line is that 101,047 number doesn’t overstate the problem. The 45,000 estimated “residents who are not prohibited persons” and who never successfully purchase ammunition is a clear underestimate of the harm of the regulations.

(Visited 89 times, 1 visits today)



  1. Francisco Rodriguez

    That’s why I recommend buy your ammo and weapons on the Black Market.
    Set up an account with a parcel post carrier and the seller will have it shipped to you.
    Use fake name and an address where you can have it delivered.
    I do the same when I buy marijuana from California and have it shipped to Florida.
    No grow houses to get busted.
    25 years and counting..

  2. Dick Winningstad

    I bet reloading equipment sales and out of state purchases have skyrocketed.


  1. At Newsweek: Americans' very right to keep and bear arms is on the ballot this election - Crime Prevention Research CenterCrime Prevention Research Center - […] California imposed background checks on ammunition purchases in July 2019, 101,047 non-prohibited, law-abiding Californians were prevented from buying bullets because of…
  2. Americans' Very Right to Keep and Bear Arms Is on the Ballot This Election | Opinion – Investor Newsletter - […] California imposed background checks on ammunition purchases in July 2019, 101,047 non-prohibited, law-abiding Californians were prevented from buying bullets…