CPRC on the Michelle Mendoza Show 820AM KGNW (Live from Seattle): Discussion on the Senate Gun-Control Measures after the Orlando Massacre

Jun 24, 2016 | Featured

 

Screen Shot 2016-06-23 at 2.08.00 PM

Dr. John Lott talked with host Michelle Mendoza about the four gun-control measures before the Senate after the Orlando Terror Attack. Dr. Lott explains why these measures would not have stopped this terror attack, as well as any other mass public shootings over the past decades.

The democrats offered up an amendment that would have prevented anyone on a terrorist watch list or no fly list from being able to buy guns. However, the Orlando attacker was not on a watch list and other mass shooters have not been on watch lists.

The democrats also offered up an amendment to make all private transfers of guns illegal without a background check. The terrorist in Orlando did not buy his guns from a private individual. He bought his guns through a gun shop that ran a background check which he passed. He still would have been able to get a gun even if background checks were required on private transfers of guns from an individual seller. The Oregon shooting last year, the Colorado shooting, the California shooting in San Bernardino, already had background checks on private transfers. It would not have mattered in those cases anyway because those individuals obtained their guns legally.

(June 20, 2016 5:00pm-5:15pm Pacific)

 

 

 

 

johnrlott

0 Comments

Categories

Archives

UPDATED: Despite Lula’s Campaign Promises, the Number of Licensed Firearm Owners in Brazil Increased by at least 18% Between 2022 and 2026, and total guns owned up slightly by 3.3%

UPDATED: Despite Lula’s Campaign Promises, the Number of Licensed Firearm Owners in Brazil Increased by at least 18% Between 2022 and 2026, and total guns owned up slightly by 3.3%

UPDATE: Data directly from the Federal Police shows a different set of numbers (Original Post below). The number of CAC licenses in Brazil increased from 867,472 in 2022 to 1,026,633 in 2026 (see screenshots below), but those are internal government numbers that links...

So is there really a question of whether Trump reduced crime in DC? Did the Washington Post inaccurately report murder data to make the drop look smaller than it actually is?

So is there really a question of whether Trump reduced crime in DC? Did the Washington Post inaccurately report murder data to make the drop look smaller than it actually is?

The Washington Post doesn't really want to give President Trump credit for the drop in crime in DC. Please look at the graph above and notice that there was a discrete change in August and September 2025 (and the change only started about half way through August on...