Donate

CPRC at Fox News: “Media Matters, the facts and me”

Dec 9, 2014 | Featured

media bias on guns op-ed

John Lott’s newest piece starts this way:

With just one telephone call this year, Erik Wemple of the Washington Post was able to convince Media Matters to let me respond to their attacks on me in the comments section of their website — after they ignored my emails, telephone calls, numerous tweets and posts for seven years.

Media Matters purports to correct misinformation that the “conservative” media puts out, but, ironically, they have systematically hidden comments critical of their work from their readers. They have a blog where it appears that conservatives and others can respond, but they don’t tell their readers that they have regularly removed responses that they couldn’t answer.

I have been attacked in over 80 posts on Media Matters over the years. They have even criticized reporters from such places as the Washington Post and the New York Times just for interviewing me. They have described me as a “discredited gun researcher.” They have claimed “Gun Advocate John Lott Lashes out at Trayvon Martin’s Mother.” They say I’ve misrepresented Obama’s record on guns, what “assault weapons” are and the views of police on gun control. They have used doctored pictures of me and screen shots of posts.

Media Matters uses a hit-and-run strategy: Attack, and move on to the next attack. They never acknowledge responses, even those published in major media like the ones I’ve written for Fox News.

If Media Matters started engaging in debates, their readers would quickly learn that their criticisms of others involve mischaracterizations, carefully edited quotes and outright lies. Their unwillingness to post contrary comments says a lot about their inability to defend themselves.

A typical example was their March 20 post covering a piece I wrote for FoxNews.com on Vivek Murthy, President Obama’s nominee for surgeon general. Media Matters’ headline read: “On Obama’s Surgeon General Nominee, It’s Medical Experts Vs. Discredited Gun Zealots.” With 288 mainly positive comments on their post, Media Matters apparently worried that people might find the ones I posted with a link to the discussion on my website. So Media Matters simply removed my comments. . . . .

The piece continues here.

johnrlott

0 Comments

Categories

Archives

Younger and more liberal Americans are much more likely to think political violence can be justified. Very liberal Americans are 8.3 times more likely than very conservatives to say it. 18 to 29 year olds are 6.67 times more likely than those 65+.

Younger and more liberal Americans are much more likely to think political violence can be justified. Very liberal Americans are 8.3 times more likely than very conservatives to say it. 18 to 29 year olds are 6.67 times more likely than those 65+.

by | May 18, 2026 |

A September 2025 survey by YouGov show that while 11 percent of Americans adults think that violence by citizens to achieve political goals can be justified, the results vary dramatically by age and political ideology. Twenty-five percent of those who classified...

Likely voters by more than a 2-to-1 rate want the SAVE Act passed, Overwhelmingly believe on U.S. citizens who’ll be allowed to vote, and believe non-citizens are illegally registered to vote

Likely voters by more than a 2-to-1 rate want the SAVE Act passed, Overwhelmingly believe on U.S. citizens who’ll be allowed to vote, and believe non-citizens are illegally registered to vote

by | May 18, 2026 |

Screenshot The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey (May 10 to 12, 2026 of 1,060 likely voters) found voters strongly support the SAVE Act—which would require proof of U.S. citizenship to register for federal elections— by a 63% to 30% margin,...