MYTH: FIREARMS RESEARCH FELL AFTER THE NRA RESTRICTIONS ON FEDERAL FUNDING

Feb 27, 2014 | Featured

The CPRC is proud to release a new study that is available here.

Here is part of a news story on the report from Fox News:

A forthcoming study is challenging claims, repeated over and over in the media, that federal restrictions effectively froze gun research over the last two decades.

The Crime Prevention Research Center study examined how a 1996 decision by Congress to strip funding for firearms research actually impacted the world of academia. To hear national media outlets tell it, the decision led to a drought in research from 1996 to 2013 — when such funding was once again allowed. Stories from The Washington Post, NBC News, Reuters and other outlets all have claimed that Washington, with the backing of the National Rifle Association, basically banned gun studies during that period.

Far from it, the study claims. “Federal funding declined, but research either remained constant or even increased,” the authors wrote.

The study shows the number of firearms-related journal articles published every year, after hitting 69 in 1996, rarely dipped below 60 and even spiked to 121 last year.

The report challenges not only the media narrative but also the notion that researchers need a constant flow of federal money in order to thrive. . . .

The rest of the Fox News story is available here.

Breitbart’s Big Government had a discussion available here.

johnrlott

1 Comment

  1. Margie

    Actually no matter if someone doesn’t understand then its
    up to other people that they will help, so here it takes place.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. What the press is missing in Bloomberg's anti-gun push | ALs Firearms Blog - [...] an equally flawed study in early 2013 from Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns claimed: “As a result, [...]
  2. Lux Libertas – Light and Liberty » What the press is missing in Bloomberg’s anti-gun push - [...] an equally flawed study in early 2013 from Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns claimed: “As a result, [...]
  3. As if we didn’t already know » Gun Owners' Resource - […] journals.  In addition, looking at publications from only 2011 through 2013 also picks up a recent surge in public health studies…
  4. Where does science fall on the gun control debate? John Lott replies to David Hemenway | WARRIOR CAPITALIST - […] journals.  In addition, looking at publications from only 2011 through 2013 also picks up a recent surge in public…
  5. the healty - […] are increasing, that attacks with �assault weapons� are the most deadly, that firearms research fell dramatically after the restrictions on federal funding, and…

Archives

Two-thirds of Voters (except liberals, those who think the country is going in the right direction, and those who approve of Biden’s job) are Concerned that Fraud will affect the 2024 Presidential Election.

Two-thirds of Voters (except liberals, those who think the country is going in the right direction, and those who approve of Biden’s job) are Concerned that Fraud will affect the 2024 Presidential Election.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 66% of Likely U.S. voters are concerned that the outcome of the presidential election will be affected by cheating, including 40% who are Very Concerned. Thirty-one percent (31%) aren’t...