Featured

At the Daily Caller: Here’s Why A Universal Background Check Law Would Be Bad

14 Aug , 2019  

Nikki Goeser, our executive director, has a new op-ed at the Daily Caller. Her piece starts this way:

Since the shootings in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio, many politicians have claimed that a federal law mandating universal background checks — which would apply to the transfer of firearms between private citizens — would help solve, or at least reduce, such shootings in the future.

The problem is not one mass public shooting this century would have been stopped if such a law had been in effect.

In fact, such a system would have real costs and unintended consequences for the public.

Presently, background checks are conducted on those who purchase firearms through the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). Of those who are rejected, the vast majority are “false positives,” meaning they are mistaken for prohibited people and wrongly denied a purchase.

If you’re being stalked or if your life has been threatened and you need to obtain a gun quickly to protect yourself or your loved ones, that problem can be very dangerous, and potentially lethal.

The Bureau of Justice Statistics last released a full annual report on NICS in 2010. (The Obama administration stopped releasing annual reports after that year.) The report revealed that 72,659 individuals had been denied because of NICS. Of that number, just 44 individuals had faced federal prosecutions, and just 13 were convicted.

The reason is simple. All of the information you must provide — on a so-called 4473 form — is not used to properly check the purchaser. Instead of using a person’s exact name, the government looks for phonetically similar names. Using roughly phonetically-similar names and birthdates does not make a reliable system.

Over the years, these “false positives” have added up to several million people. That is several million people who were denied their basic human right of self-defense.

While in theory it is possible to appeal these decisions yourself, most people have to hire a lawyer. It costs thousands of dollars to pay an attorney to try and have the mistake cleared up, and the process can take many months. Not everyone has the luxury of that kind of money or time. The person threatening your life will not patiently wait for you to get this mistake fixed before they choose to attack you. . . .

The rest of her piece is available here.

By



1 Response

  1. Tionico says:

    As much fuss as is made over this broken system, it seems beyond imagination that it does NOT base every record/inquiry on EXACT NAME and date of birth.

    WHY cannot this system simply use the exact name as registered for one’s entire life with the Social Security System? That never changes, except by court order as when someone marries. But then the name oh that account is changed to the new name. Again, by using that exact name as registered with Social Security, all the false matches, near misses, phonetic similarities, are done away with.

    Their refusal to FIX this reeks of incompetence. Or possibly a deliberate choice of will to MAKE the system ineffective.

    What really should happen is for the entire NICS system to be made accessible to anyone wishing to sell a firearm. Access the website, enter name exactly as is registered with Social Security, enter date of birth, and state of residence. Once all three of these are entered, the system clunks and clangs, and delivers a PROCEED or DENY code together with a number. Seller records that number for future reference. If PROCEED is given, proceed with the sale. If DENY, then it is up to the putative transferee to find out how to fix it.

    Note, I did NOT make any mention of the descriptio of the arm being transfered. Why? Not germane to the query. The system was originally set up to determine whether the PERSON acquiring the firearm is legally able to possess one. WHAT he is wanting to possess is NOT the question. Stick to the Main Thing…. which is this:
    is George lawfully able to be in possession of a firearm at present, the one I am wanting to sell? Yes? No? With that answer provided by the system, that’s all that is needed to proceed with the sale.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *